Transport level security VS message level security in WCF
January 28th, 2010 by Sanket
Transport level security VS message level security in WCF
Advantages of Transport level security
Does not need any extra coding as protocol inherent security is used.
Performance is better as we can use hardware accelerators to enhance performance.
There is lot of interoperability support and communicating clients do not need to understand WS security as it’s built in the protocol itself.
Disadvantages...Default types of WCF bindings in .NET
January 27th, 2010 by Sanket
Default types of WCF bindings in .NET
Within the Windows Communication Foundation programming model, bindings are represented by the System.ServiceModel.Channels.Binding class. All binding classes must derive from this base class.
Following are the different bindings provided by WCF by default:
1. BasicHttpBinding
2. WSHttpBinding
3. WSDualHttpBinding
4. WSFederationHttpBinding
5. NetTcpBinding...Client Credential Type in WCF
January 16th, 2010 by Sanket
Different Client Credential Type provided in WCF – Windows communication foundation
The choice of client credential type depends on the security mode in place. For transport security you can require a Windows credential or certificate-and there are variations on how Windows credentials are passed via TCP, HTTP and MSMQ. Message security supports any of the following settings for clientCredentialType:
None...